The answer may surprise you: it’s yes. But not in a name-calling sense—we’re talking about the actual definition of the word "loser." Those who vehemently oppose AI are fighting a Don Quixote-like battle, chasing windmills of their own imagination while trying to restrict the outlet and creativity of others for no good reason. They’re like the die-hard Betamax fans of the past, clinging to a format doomed for irrelevance.

Their opposition stems from a misguided belief that they’re defending human creativity, yet they fail to acknowledge the very human creativity that fuels AI-generated content. In doing so, they’re losing touch with a technological trend that is here to stay. Like any puritanical movement, they can always choose to immerse themselves in fully human-produced music from an increasingly dwindling pool of creators. But most will eventually come to embrace the new normal, while the rest fade into irrelevance.

🔥 Update – July 6, 2025

Since publishing this article, I’ve received multiple death threats for speaking plainly about AI music and copyright law.

Let me be clear:
I take every threat seriously.
All messages containing violent or harassing content are being documented, investigated, and forwarded to the appropriate authorities — including platform moderators and legal channels where necessary.

If your goal was to silence this message, you just amplified it.

And now it has a soundtrack:

🎧 Listen to the response track: “Mic in My Hand (Book of War)”
Built in Suno, forged in truth:
👉 https://suno.com/s/OMyaFFtSBY4zPJMQ

I don’t run. I don’t bow. I build.
And I’ll keep building.

— Jack Righteous

Why Hating AI is a Losing Battle

1. Resistance to Change is Historically a Losing Strategy

Technological progress has always faced resistance. When photography first emerged, painters feared it would diminish their craft. When synthesizers were introduced, traditional musicians called them a threat to "real" music. The pattern is clear: innovation often meets hostility, but it ultimately prevails. AI is no different.

• Historical Parallel: The Luddites of the Industrial Revolution destroyed machinery they believed would take their jobs. Today, they’re a historical footnote, while technology has transformed the world. AI opponents risk a similar fate.
• Adaptability Drives Progress: Just as previous technological shifts brought about more inclusive tools (e.g., text-to-speech, braille), AI is bridging gaps for those with disabilities. Opposing AI ignores its role in fostering accessibility.

2. Misunderstanding the Nature of AI Creativity

Critics often argue that AI-generated content lacks authenticity or soul. What they overlook is that AI tools are created, guided, and refined by humans. The AI doesn’t act autonomously; it executes the vision and parameters set by its creators.

• Human Creativity at the Core: Behind every AI-generated song, painting, or story, there’s a human artist shaping its output.
• Empowering the Underserved: AI tools allow people with physical or cognitive disabilities to participate in creativity, enabling artistic expression previously out of reach.

3. A Technology That’s Here to Stay

AI is not a passing trend; it’s becoming a foundational tool across industries. From healthcare to entertainment, AI is revolutionizing processes and possibilities. Music and art are no exception.

• Adoption is Growing: Platforms like Spotify, YouTube, and SoundCloud are filled with AI-assisted music, and audiences are embracing it.
• Advancing Accessibility: AI helps creators with disabilities access tools that level the playing field, making creativity more inclusive.

The Irony of the Opposition

The most ironic part of the anti-AI sentiment is that it often comes from people who rely on technology daily. Social media platforms, smartphones, and streaming services all use AI, yet these critics don’t boycott them. Their selective outrage highlights the inconsistency in their stance. Worse, their opposition would take away tools from those who depend on AI for accessibility, like the visually impaired or neurodivergent creators.

Personal Perspective: Hypocrisy and Extremism

As someone who actively promotes AI-sourced content on my website and engages with people on social media—particularly Reddit (much to my "karma" detriment)—I’ve seen firsthand the hypocrisy of some opponents. It’s frustrating to see individuals call for the criminalization of LLM platforms and those who profit from them. This notion is utterly ridiculous.

The reality is that major players in the music industry, including record labels, are vying to own LLMs exclusively rather than share access with the public. Music has always evolved—from beats in ancient times to today’s AI-generated tracks. The Scrooge-like individuals trying to block this progress are in for a lifetime of disappointment, constantly losing at "music life." These critics ignore how restricting such technology could hinder accessibility and inclusion for marginalized groups.

What Does the Future Hold?

AI haters face two choices: adapt or become irrelevant. As with any technological leap, resistance is futile in the long run. Just as people once feared electricity, automobiles, and the internet, AI skepticism will fade as its benefits become undeniable.

• A Creative Renaissance: Artists who embrace AI will lead a new wave of innovation, creating works that were previously unimaginable.
• Cultural Acceptance: As AI tools become more accessible, the distinction between "AI-generated" and "human-generated" art will blur. Ultimately, audiences will value the emotional and intellectual impact of the work over its origins.

Conclusion

Opposing AI is not just a losing battle; it’s a refusal to engage with the future. Far from destroying creativity, AI is a tool that expands it, offering new ways for artists to express themselves. The true losers are those who cling to outdated ideas, ignoring the opportunities this technology presents. For the rest of us, the future of creativity has never looked brighter.