VIP Milestone 1: Validate and Position Your Publishing Project

Jack Righteous

Independent Publisher Academy · Milestone 1 of 20 · VIP Advanced Implementation

Validate and Position Your Publishing Project

The free Milestone 1 work helps you choose a project you can finish. This advanced implementation helps you determine whether the project is also worth developing in its current form.

Complete the two free foundation pages first:

  1. Choose Your Independent Publishing Project
  2. How to Choose Your First Independent Publishing Project

VIP outcome: a validated project decision supported by audience evidence, strategic fit, human contribution, a defined publishing role and a controlled expansion plan.

What changes at the advanced level

A beginner asks, “Can I finish this?” An independent publisher must also ask:

  • Does this project have a clear reason to exist?
  • Does the intended audience already demonstrate interest in the subject, format or result?
  • What am I contributing that cannot be replaced by generic AI output?
  • How does the project support my voice, brand or body of work?
  • Should it be free, paid, serialized, bundled or used to lead into something else?
  • What future value could it create without increasing the current production scope?

Part 1: Build the project decision record

Create one document and add these headings:

  1. Project statement
  2. Audience situation
  3. Evidence of need or interest
  4. Human contribution
  5. Comparable projects
  6. Distinctive angle
  7. Minimum viable scope
  8. Publishing role
  9. Risks and missing capabilities
  10. Decision and reasons

This record should preserve your reasoning. It will become useful when the project changes, when AI suggestions create drift or when a future collaborator asks why decisions were made.

Part 2: Score strategic fit

Score the project from 1 to 5 against each criterion. Add a short note beside every score. The explanation matters more than the number.

Criterion Question Score
Creator fit Does this use my experience, perspective, skill or creative direction? __/5
Audience fit Can I identify a real situation in which someone would want this? __/5
Evidence Do questions, searches, conversations, sales or engagement support the idea? __/5
Distinctiveness Is there a clear reason to choose this version rather than a generic alternative? __/5
Completion fit Can the minimum version be completed with current or accessible resources? __/5
Brand fit Does this move my public work in a direction I want to continue? __/5
Reuse value Can the finished work support future content, products or learning? __/5
Commercial or mission value Does it create a useful business, audience, educational or community outcome? __/5

How to interpret the score

  • 32–40: strong candidate, provided no major rights or production issue remains.
  • 24–31: viable, but the record should identify what must be clarified or reduced.
  • 16–23: do not abandon it automatically; reconsider the audience, format, scope or timing.
  • Below 16: keep the idea, but it is unlikely to be the strongest current project.

This is a decision aid, not a promise of sales or audience response.

Part 3: Validate the audience situation

Do not begin with broad demographics. Begin with the situation that makes the project relevant.

Audience situation statement

My intended audience is currently trying to ______.

They are commonly blocked by ______.

They currently use, read, watch, listen to or buy ______.

My project will help by ______.

The evidence I have is ______.

Useful evidence can include recurring customer questions, comments, search data, community conversations, sales patterns, course feedback, support requests or strong engagement with related content. One conversation is a signal, not proof. Several independent signals are more useful.

Apply the deeper audience work in Find Your Brand: Who This Is For and the Audience Situation Worksheet.

Part 4: Compare reference projects without copying them

Select three to five reference projects that serve a similar audience, use a similar format or aim for a similar result. They do not need to be direct competitors.

For each reference, record:

  • Project title and creator
  • Intended audience
  • Core promise or experience
  • Format and approximate scope
  • Free, paid or mixed access
  • What appears especially useful
  • What appears generic, missing or mismatched
  • What you will intentionally do differently

The goal is not to manufacture difference for its own sake. It is to understand audience expectations and identify where your contribution is strongest.

Part 5: Define your human contribution

AI may help with research organization, outlining, alternatives, editing, production assistance or formatting. Your project still needs a documented human centre.

Identify which contributions apply:

  • Original idea or creative premise
  • Personal experience or testimony
  • Original research, reporting or interviews
  • Teaching method or framework
  • Original lyrics, story, analysis or commentary
  • Performance or voice
  • Selection, arrangement and editorial judgment
  • Visual or sonic direction
  • Fact-checking and source decisions
  • Final revision and approval

For music projects, the AI Music Proof Record provides a Suno-focused documentation system. For broader publishing work, reproduce the same principle in your project record: preserve drafts, prompts, source notes, revisions, dates and final decisions.

Part 6: Apply Find Your Voice

Your project format should support the way you can most credibly communicate.

Use the following questions:

  • What do I know, believe, notice or express that belongs in this project?
  • What language would feel natural coming from me?
  • Which parts require my direct writing, performance, commentary or judgment?
  • Where could AI wording flatten or distort my point?
  • What should the audience understand about my role?

Relevant paid-access resources:

Part 7: Apply Find Your Brand

The project should have one defined role in your public body of work.

Choose the closest role:

  • Foundation: explains what you believe, teach or create.
  • Entry point: gives a new audience a useful first experience.
  • Authority builder: demonstrates depth, proof or original thinking.
  • Audience builder: creates a reason to subscribe, follow or return.
  • Offer: provides a paid result, asset or experience.
  • Support asset: helps people use another product, release or service.
  • Campaign: directs attention toward a defined action.
  • Creative catalogue: adds a meaningful work to a larger body of art.

A first project should usually have one primary role and no more than one secondary role.

Relevant Find Your Brand work:

Part 8: Choose the publishing model

Do not assume every useful project must be sold directly.

Model Best used when
Free public project Reach, trust, education or audience growth is the main outcome.
Free with paid companion The free work explains or starts the process; the paid work supports deeper implementation.
One-time paid product The project delivers a defined asset or result without requiring ongoing updates.
Membership or gated resource The value depends on a wider library, continued support or connected learning.
Serialized release The audience benefits from receiving the work in stages and you can sustain the schedule.
Campaign asset The project primarily exists to support a release, offer, event or audience action.

Record the selected model and why it supports the project outcome. Pricing, packaging and platform decisions will be developed in later milestones.

Part 9: Control expansion before it controls you

Create two lists.

Required for Version 1

Only include assets necessary for the project to be complete, understandable and deliverable.

Possible after publication

Place audiobooks, companion courses, bonus episodes, translations, merchandise, extended campaigns, memberships and sequels here unless one is essential to Version 1.

This is one of the most important advanced publishing habits: design for expansion without producing the expansion too early.

Part 10: Run the risk review

Identify any issue that could prevent completion or responsible publication:

  • Unclear rights, permissions or source ownership
  • Claims requiring specialist fact-checking
  • Personal information or confidential material
  • Unlicensed music, images, text or trademarks
  • Platform rules you have not reviewed
  • Production requirements outside your capability
  • An audience promise larger than the project can deliver
  • A schedule that depends on uninterrupted motivation

This training does not replace legal, tax, medical or other professional advice. Escalate issues that require qualified review.

Advanced AI prompt sequence

Use the prompts in order. Save both your input and the useful parts of each response in the decision record.

Prompt 1: Challenge the scope

Act as a practical independent publishing project reviewer. My project statement is: [statement]. The intended finished version is: [scope]. My available resources are: [resources]. Identify hidden production requirements, vague boundaries and features that should be moved to a later version. Preserve the core purpose and do not invent a larger business around it.

Prompt 2: Test audience relevance

My intended audience situation is: [statement]. Evidence I currently have includes: [evidence]. Distinguish what is supported, what is only assumed and what I should verify before production. Suggest five low-cost validation actions appropriate to this specific project.

Prompt 3: Protect human contribution

Review this project plan and identify where my original experience, research, creative decisions, writing, performance or editorial judgment must remain visible. Flag areas where generic AI-generated material could weaken trust or distinctiveness.

Prompt 4: Compare publishing models

Compare a free public release, free-plus-paid companion, one-time paid product, gated membership resource and serialized release for this project. Evaluate audience access, production burden, ongoing support, brand value and realistic monetization. Do not recommend a model solely because it can charge money.

Your final Milestone 1 decision

Selected project: ______

Audience situation: ______

Primary result: ______

Version 1 finish line: ______

Human contribution: ______

Publishing role: ______

Publishing model: ______

Strongest evidence: ______

Main risk: ______

Decision: proceed now / revise scope / hold for later

VIP completion standard

Milestone 1 is complete at the advanced level when you can defend the decision without relying on hype, trend language or AI enthusiasm. You should know why this project, why this audience, why this format, why this scope and why now.

  • ☐ The project has a documented human centre.
  • ☐ Audience relevance is supported by at least one real signal.
  • ☐ Three or more references were compared without copying.
  • ☐ Version 1 has a controlled finish line.
  • ☐ The project has one primary role in the larger creator journey.
  • ☐ The publishing model supports that role.
  • ☐ Expansion ideas have been moved out of Version 1.
  • ☐ Major risks and outside-support needs are recorded.
  • ☐ A clear proceed, revise or hold decision has been made.

Next: Milestone 2

Your project is selected. The next milestone will define the intended audience in enough detail to guide content, packaging and publishing decisions.

Milestone 2: Define the Intended Audience — coming next in the Independent Publisher Academy.

Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.