Done Did It: A Diss Track About Anger, Faith & Accountability

Fast answer: why I made the track

The song was my emotional response to a specific, widely reported piece of footage from a Los Angeles hotel in 2016 and to Combs’s public apology after that footage was released. I was angry, disturbed and looking for a way to process what I had seen without pretending a song was a courtroom or that I knew the facts of every other claim connected to him.

That distinction matters. “Done Did It” is artistic commentary. It reflects what triggered me emotionally and spiritually at the time. It should not be read as a comprehensive legal account of Sean Combs or as a finding about allegations this page does not document.

Why I create diss tracks

Music gives me somewhere to put emotions that would otherwise sit unresolved. A diss track can be confrontation, satire, argument and release at the same time. For me, the challenge is making sure anger becomes expression rather than an excuse to become careless with other people.

That is especially important when a song reacts to real people and real events. The sharper the commentary, the more important it is to know which parts are documented, which parts are interpretation and which parts are simply the artist saying, “This is how this made me feel.”

Anger and faith can occupy the same song

When I originally released “Done Did It,” I described the tension as trying to keep Jesus in my heart while being genuinely angry. I still think that tension is worth preserving. Faith does not require pretending anger does not exist. For me, it requires deciding what I do with it.

That is why I wanted the song to be forceful without using profanity as the engine of the message. The goal was not perfection. It was to channel the reaction into something creative while holding myself to a boundary I believed mattered.

What this page actually documents

Those two items are the factual context this song page needs. I do not need to keep extending the article every time another allegation, filing or proceeding appears. That would turn a music page into an unreliable legal-news tracker.

What I would do differently now

The 2024 version used the phrase “various legal troubles.” That was too broad for an article whose real focus was one specific event and my reaction to it. Today I would write the page with a tighter evidence standard from the start: name the documented event that inspired the work, link to the source material, and avoid expanding an emotional song into claims the article is not equipped to prove.

That is a useful creator lesson beyond this particular song. If your work comments on a real person, controversy or breaking event, preserve the difference between what happened, what has been alleged, what you believe, and what the art is expressing. Those are not interchangeable categories.