Mont-Real Geschichten: Glaube, Kultur & Schöpferleben
Why AI Haters Are Losing the Battle
Discover how opposing AI limits creativity and accessibility, and why embracing it is key to the future of art and innovation.
Are People Who Hate AI Losers?
The answer may surprise you: it’s yes. But not in a name-calling sense—we’re talking about the actual definition of the word "loser." Those who vehemently oppose AI are fighting a Don Quixote-like battle, chasing windmills of their own imagination while trying to restrict the outlet and creativity of others for no good reason. They’re like the die-hard Betamax fans of the past, clinging to a format doomed for irrelevance.
Their opposition stems from a misguided belief that they’re defending human creativity, yet they fail to acknowledge the very human creativity that fuels AI-generated content. In doing so, they’re losing touch with a technological trend that is here to stay. Like any puritanical movement, they can always choose to immerse themselves in fully human-produced music from an increasingly dwindling pool of creators. But most will eventually come to embrace the new normal, while the rest fade into irrelevance.
🔥 Update – July 6, 2025
Since publishing this article, I’ve received multiple death threats for speaking plainly about AI music and copyright law.
Let me be clear:
I take every threat seriously.
All messages containing violent or harassing content are being documented, investigated, and forwarded to the appropriate authorities — including platform moderators and legal channels where necessary.
If your goal was to silence this message, you just amplified it.
And now it has a soundtrack:
🎧 Listen to the response track: “Mic in My Hand (Book of War)”
Built in Suno, forged in truth:
👉 https://suno.com/s/OMyaFFtSBY4zPJMQ
I don’t run. I don’t bow. I build.
And I’ll keep building.
— Jack Righteous
Why Hating AI is a Losing Battle
1. Resistance to Change is Historically a Losing Strategy
Technological progress has always faced resistance. When photography first emerged, painters feared it would diminish their craft. When synthesizers were introduced, traditional musicians called them a threat to "real" music. The pattern is clear: innovation often meets hostility, but it ultimately prevails. AI is no different.
- Historical Parallel: The Luddites of the Industrial Revolution destroyed machinery they believed would take their jobs. Today, they’re a historical footnote, while technology has transformed the world. AI opponents risk a similar fate.
- Adaptability Drives Progress: Just as previous technological shifts brought about more inclusive tools (e.g., text-to-speech, braille), AI is bridging gaps for those with disabilities. Opposing AI ignores its role in fostering accessibility.
2. Misunderstanding the Nature of AI Creativity
Critics often argue that AI-generated content lacks authenticity or soul. What they overlook is that AI tools are created, guided, and refined by humans. The AI doesn’t act autonomously; it executes the vision and parameters set by its creators.
- Human Creativity at the Core: Behind every AI-generated song, painting, or story, there’s a human artist shaping its output.
- Empowering the Underserved: AI tools allow people with physical or cognitive disabilities to participate in creativity, enabling artistic expression previously out of reach.
3. A Technology That’s Here to Stay
AI is not a passing trend; it’s becoming a foundational tool across industries. From healthcare to entertainment, AI is revolutionizing processes and possibilities. Music and art are no exception.
- Adoption is Growing: Platforms like Spotify, YouTube, and SoundCloud are filled with AI-assisted music, and audiences are embracing it.
- Advancing Accessibility: AI helps creators with disabilities access tools that level the playing field, making creativity more inclusive.
The Irony of the Opposition
The most ironic part of the anti-AI sentiment is that it often comes from people who rely on technology daily. Social media platforms, smartphones, and streaming services all use AI, yet these critics don’t boycott them. Their selective outrage highlights the inconsistency in their stance. Worse, their opposition would take away tools from those who depend on AI for accessibility, like the visually impaired or neurodivergent creators.
Personal Perspective: Hypocrisy and Extremism
As someone who actively promotes AI-sourced content on my website and engages with people on social media—particularly Reddit (much to my "karma" detriment)—I’ve seen firsthand the hypocrisy of some opponents. It’s frustrating to see individuals call for the criminalization of LLM platforms and those who profit from them. This notion is utterly ridiculous.
The reality is that major players in the music industry, including record labels, are vying to own LLMs exclusively rather than share access with the public. Music has always evolved—from beats in ancient times to today’s AI-generated tracks. The Scrooge-like individuals trying to block this progress are in for a lifetime of disappointment, constantly losing at "music life." These critics ignore how restricting such technology could hinder accessibility and inclusion for marginalized groups.
What Does the Future Hold?
AI haters face two choices: adapt or become irrelevant. As with any technological leap, resistance is futile in the long run. Just as people once feared electricity, automobiles, and the internet, AI skepticism will fade as its benefits become undeniable.
- A Creative Renaissance: Artists who embrace AI will lead a new wave of innovation, creating works that were previously unimaginable.
- Cultural Acceptance: As AI tools become more accessible, the distinction between "AI-generated" and "human-generated" art will blur. Ultimately, audiences will value the emotional and intellectual impact of the work over its origins.
Conclusion
Opposing AI is not just a losing battle; it’s a refusal to engage with the future. Far from destroying creativity, AI is a tool that expands it, offering new ways for artists to express themselves. The true losers are those who cling to outdated ideas, ignoring the opportunities this technology presents. For the rest of us, the future of creativity has never looked brighter.
Continue the wider investigation
Technology is also about control, resources and human consequences.
Continue through Tech Culture & Power for connected reporting on infrastructure, ownership and public impact.
Discussion
I FIRMLY stand with Gary Whittaker and I detest every hateful and disrespecting AI hater with every fiber of my being. We all know they are paid for shills by the deep state. And may they ROAST in Hell.
AI is here to stay whether if you like it or not. You BETTER accept AI and you BETTER bot threaten anyone who uses AI. To all you AI hating sons of bees, you don’t need compassion… you annoying airheads just need a good ol’ fashion American BEATDOWN.
FREAK YOUR HATRED OF AI.
FREAK YOUR THREATS.
FREAK YOUR FAKE PAID FOR REVOLUTION.
Want to post more hateful and disrespecting threats? Feel free to leave your concerns at P.O. Box Landfill. Because that’s where all of your negative AI opinions belong.
We AI lovers have owned, manhandled, and destroyed are you AI threatening haters forever.
I FIRMLY SUPPORT AI · December 18, 2025
🔒 Statement on Free Speech, AI Extremism, and Threats
I’m a strong supporter of free speech — including disagreement. Civil debate is welcome here. But threats, bullying, and intimidation are not.
When it comes to anti-AI extremism, I need to be even clearer: there is no conversation to be had with those who think threatening people is justified. To make that point visible, I’ve left some of the threats posted — the rest will be removed unless they offer actual value to the discussion.
Yes, there are real risks with AI. Some credible PhDs believe we may have already crossed a line we can’t reverse — something I plan to explore in future posts. That matters. But attacking individual creators or AI proponents is misguided. AI is being deployed at massive scale by governments and corporations. Targeting individuals solves nothing.
If you’re making threats because you think you’re saving the world — you’ve lost your way. And I say that as someone who has been in dark places, too. You’re not unique. You’re not alone. But you are wrong.
You think you’re crazy? So am I. So are all of us when pushed hard enough. That doesn’t make you special — it just means you’re human.
And if you’re threatening others, it’s time to stop and get help. Not just for them — but for yourself.
— Jack Righteous
Anonymous · July 07, 2025
You’re just as soulless and devoid as the fucking clankers dick you suck
Charlie lee Borders · July 07, 2025
We are not trolls, Gary Whittaker.
We are a revolutionary movement, worthy both of fear and respect.
We will not be treated with contempt or defiance.
And we will never become irrelevant, no matter how hard you and your supporters try.
We are here to stay.
Luddite Power Worldwide · July 06, 2025
LMAO @ Trolls below.
Anonymous · July 06, 2025
“I am not your therapist.”
Yes you are. Welcome to the business world.
Jack Assness · July 04, 2025
You should be careful speaking to people online, stillborn. Some people have enough ANFO to blow up your precious little windmills.
Michael Gaines · July 04, 2025
Facts:
1. You are a self-important blowhard.
2. Despite your claims of promoting creativity and humanity, you do neither and are destroying both.
3. The Luddites actually have a point in that mechanization only replaces jobs, not create them. Those guys aren’t footnotes in history, although you might be at the rate you’re going.
4. This war against AI is about saving humans from extinction, saving morals from being carelessly thrown away, and a union of overall common sense. Economics and feelings of AI becoming culturally acceptable are wholly irrelevant.
5. AI is not the future anyone wants or needs, but was forced on us by countries, big tech companies and rogue operators like you.
6. By definition, AI is inherently evil, because it was created out of spite towards the working class. That is why it should never be used for any reason.
7. Your hostile responses to the first two comments shows that you don’t care about the truth.
8. AI is taking away our homes, our jobs, our families, our everyday liveihood.
9. Every person using AI has abandoned their morals for the almighty dollar – including you, Gary.
10. I have no social media, cellphone or streaming service, so my argument is absolutely valid.
11. Every time someone brings hard facts to the table, you blow them off and namecall them. That makes you a morally reprehensible blowhard.
12. The war against AI will be won by the Luddites, not by AI-shaggers.
Here’s my alternate email address, Jack, if you’re interested in being an adult:
ludditepowerworldwide@getalife.com
James Hand · July 02, 2025
Listen here, you self-important blowhard! If you really give a damn about creativity and humanity, you would stop using artificial intelligence, and you would not be hostile to those who oppose it! Artificial intelligence is taking away our homes, our jobs, and our families. Billions of people just like you have abandoned proper morals just so they can “get ahead.” The only place you, and everyone else like you, are going is the county landfill because at the end of the day, there’s no getting around the fact that your very betrayal of humanity itself makes you one thing and one thing only: garbage.
James Hand · June 29, 2025
Responding to the two posters below—and a warning to any other trolls thinking of jumping in:
Bring facts, not broken feelings. I am not your therapist.
Comment 1:
If AI seems like a 3-year-old to you, that says more about your skill than the tool. AI doesn’t think for you—it scales what you bring to the table. So if you’re getting garbage, maybe stop acting like a toddler yourself and learn how to prompt like an adult.
Comment 2:
You’re ranting about job loss while ignoring the wave of new roles, industries, and solo ventures being built with AI every day. This isn’t some corporate conspiracy—it’s an open opportunity. The difference? Some people are out here building. You’re busy blaming. Life doesn’t reward spectators.
Anonymous · June 23, 2025
I hate how stupid AI is.
A fucking dumb 3 year old is smarter.
AI so far has to be led like an demented idiot. I fucking hate it. Not against AI, just am sick of how dumb they are.
fucker · June 23, 2025
The opposition to AI is of a different type than ever before, mainly because of the reckless, irresponsible, and callous disregard of AI proponents for the welfare of their fellow human beings. Nobody is discussing what the consequences of people losing jobs and their abilities to sustain a livelihood will be. Such massive job losses will cause economic disruptions, social unrest, and political revolts. People who champion AI do not think.this is important, but when people struggle to survive at even a subsistence level, they are not going to be quiet about it, like AI promoters want them to be. Whether they like it or not, AI supporters and creators are going to have to deal with the consequences of their decisions. They can call replacing human workers with AI efficient all they want, but that dies not make it so. The microeconomic efficiencies of firms who are obsessed with cutting labor costs at any price will be canceled out by the fat greater macroeconomic inefficiencies wrought by their “bright” ideas and manic obsessions with firing people, as part of the current crazy anti-worker hysteria. Those macroeconomic inefficiencies are massive unemployment, underemployment, rising poverty, crime, and destitute and homeless people. The folks who wrought this damage will gave to answer for and deal with it, whether they want to or not. People stripped of their human dignity and purpose for living as well as robbed of being able to prosper through work will not be silenced by AI and their irrational advocates.
Kevin McMicken · June 03, 2025