Module 2 APPLY | Candidate Comparison Worksheet
Candidate Comparison Worksheet: Choose the strongest foundation.
Compare a small candidate set against the same project standard. Use evidence categories instead of pretending a single numerical total can tell you which version deserves development.
1 · Set the standard before comparing
2 · Compare up to four candidates
Use Strong, Mixed, Weak or Not applicable. These are decision categories, not grades. A candidate can lose even with several Strong marks if it fails a non-negotiable part of the brief.
3 · Make the decision explicit
Do not choose the cleanest, newest or most dramatic generation automatically. Choose the version that best serves the same project standard while protecting the most valuable evidence and creating the clearest next move.
4 · Save the decision record
Your answers are stored only in this browser on this device. They are not submitted to Jack Righteous. Export the PDF for a durable copy you can keep with the project.
Use the member resource that matches the real blocker.
Need stronger project/version memory across repeated tests? Use Project Decision Memory to preserve the exact asset, test question, protected evidence, controlled change, observed result and next route without rewriting upstream records.
Testing prompt assistance inside Suno? Use the optional Advanced Suno Prompt Testing Lab only when manual vs assisted prompt behavior is the actual question.
Neither resource is required to finish this free worksheet. If the decision is clear, use the record and continue.
Carry the selected candidate forward.
Continue in Track Builder →
Document the Selection Record →
Continue to Module 3 · Build the Work →