1. Confirm eligibility
Use the benefit stated in your purchase or active access. A public product rename does not create a new support entitlement and does not remove a historical one.
Member Project Guidance & Support | Eligible JR Access
Eligible Member Guidance and Support
Bring one project decision, the completed work and the evidence needed to judge it.
This is a focused review handoff for customers whose current or historical JR access explicitly includes project guidance or review. Complete the relevant training or project route first, then submit one bounded question.
Eligibility matters. Creator Library — One-Time does not include project-specific consultation, VIP Prompt Support or ongoing creator guidance by default. Creator Pro currently includes one focused consultation per month while subscribed, and Complete Access includes two per month, subject to the applicable live support, scheduling and usage terms. Existing VIP Plus customers keep any support or consultation benefit promised with their original purchase.
Use review when: two reasonable options remain, a comparison needs experienced judgment, a revision is not solving the diagnosed problem or an approval decision is blocking the next stage.
Before You Submit
Complete the smallest useful preparation.
2. Name the project
Identify the song, book, article, podcast, campaign, offer or platform you are actively moving forward.
3. State the current result
Explain what exists now and which lesson, route or project record brought you here.
4. Define one decision
Ask for one comparison, diagnosis, approval, correction or next-step decision.
Copy This Format
Use one complete review request.
ACCESS / SUPPORT BENEFIT:
PROJECT TITLE:
CURRENT GOAL:
WORKFLOW ROUTE OR TRAINING COMPLETED:
CURRENT VERSION OR ASSET LINK:
STRONGEST ELEMENT TO PROTECT:
PRIMARY DIAGNOSED ISSUE:
WHAT I ALREADY TRIED:
OPTIONS I AM COMPARING:
MY CURRENT DECISION:
ONE FOCUSED QUESTION:
WHAT I NEED FROM THIS REVIEW:
Completion gate: do not submit until the referenced asset, comparison and current project context can actually be reviewed.
Incomplete Requests
Missing preparation returns to the workflow.
A request may be returned without project judgment when eligibility is unclear, the exact asset is missing, the current route is unclear, no comparison or attempted work is shown, several unrelated questions are combined or the strongest element to protect has not been identified.
What the Review Produces
The response should end in a testable next action.
DIAGNOSIS: confirmed or corrected
PROTECT: the strongest element that should remain
PRIMARY PROBLEM: the decision or defect that comes first
RECOMMENDED INTERVENTION: the smallest useful correction
DO NOT CHANGE: boundaries for the next revision
NEXT TEST: one controlled comparison or action
SUCCESS CHECKPOINT: what must be true to approve the result
NEXT ROUTE OR STATUS: continue / retry / review / ready / held
Support Boundaries
Focused guidance is not unlimited production.
Where included, support may cover project-direction review, controlled comparison, workflow correction, training application, next-step planning and feedback on one bounded revision.
It does not automatically include full rewriting, mixing, mastering, production, legal clearance, project management, multiple unrelated outcomes or unlimited review cycles.
