JFK vs. The CIA: The Secrets of Operation Mongoose
Gary WhittakerRighteous Reads Featured Series
Part 2: The CIA vs. JFK — Operation Mongoose and the Bay of Pigs
Last revised: January 17, 2026
Main Series Hub: JFK Files: The Secrets They Reveal
Publisher’s Note: This series is built to be read like an investigation, not a slogan. Part 2 focuses on the Cuba conflict zone—where covert operations, political pressure, and institutional friction created long-term blowback. If you’re here to skim, you’ll get the outline. If you’re here to research, bring your best sources and counterpoints.
Introduction: The Secret War That Set the Stage
By the time President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in November 1963, he had already made powerful enemies—not only abroad, but inside his own government.
One of the most contested pressure points in this entire story is JFK’s relationship with the intelligence community after the disastrous Bay of Pigs invasion and the covert escalation that followed.
This article focuses on the period where trust fractured, power shifted, and covert operations created long-term institutional fallout—especially around:
- The Bay of Pigs and its consequences inside Washington
- Operation Mongoose and the covert campaign against Castro
- The overlap between intelligence operations and organized crime networks
- Why some insiders viewed JFK’s Cuba posture as a national security liability
This part of the series does not claim to solve the assassination. It explains why Cuba operations became one of the most cited contexts for motive, resentment, and institutional conflict in the years leading up to Dallas.
The CIA’s Shadow War in Cuba: What the JFK Files Add to the Story
1) The Bay of Pigs: A Disaster That Shattered Trust
The Bay of Pigs invasion (April 17, 1961) was intended to be a rapid covert operation to remove Fidel Castro. Instead, it became one of the CIA’s most visible failures and one of the most important turning points of the Kennedy presidency.
- The plan: A covert invasion of Cuba using approximately 1,400 Cuban exiles trained and armed by the CIA.
- The constraint: Kennedy refused to authorize direct U.S. military intervention.
- The outcome: Castro’s forces defeated the invasion within roughly 72 hours, capturing over 1,000 participants.
- The fallout: The event fueled long-running debate over whether Kennedy received misleading assumptions, overly confident assessments, or pressure toward escalation.
What This Suggests in Hindsight
- Many researchers argue CIA planners expected JFK to escalate with U.S. troops once events were in motion.
- JFK’s refusal widened distrust and deepened internal conflict.
- JFK later removed CIA Director Allen Dulles, a decision that remained controversial.
- Dulles later served on the Warren Commission, fueling conflict-of-interest debates.
Key Question: If trust collapsed after Bay of Pigs, how did that rupture shape later decisions and loyalties inside the state?
2) Operation Mongoose: The Covert Campaign Against Castro
After the Bay of Pigs, U.S. covert activity against Castro continued. Operation Mongoose is widely described as a major escalation—an aggressive campaign to destabilize and remove Castro from power through sabotage and other covert tactics.
A core question raised by researchers is how much operational momentum developed inside agencies—and whether some actions moved faster than presidential visibility or control.
- Organized crime involvement: Historical investigations and reporting have documented CIA contact with organized crime figures connected to anti-Castro efforts.
- Sabotage planning: Accounts of proposed sabotage plots—including poison concepts, explosives concepts, and covert disruption—remain part of the broader record surrounding Cuban operations.
- Command friction: Many interpretations of this era focus on whether operational planning outpaced centralized oversight, creating “rogue” momentum or semi-authorized improvisation.
What This Suggests in Hindsight
- Intelligence partnerships with criminal networks raise long-term ethical and structural questions.
- Unauthorized or semi-authorized operations increase the likelihood of blowback.
- Internal frustration toward JFK’s Cuba posture became a major driver of resentment narratives in assassination research.
Key Question: Did the conflict that formed around Cuba remain contained—or did it reshape power relationships inside Washington?
3) The CIA, the Mafia, and the Kennedy Family: A Dangerous Triangle
The Kennedy relationship with the Mafia remains one of the most debated themes of the wider assassination landscape. Cuba operations made that triangle sharper—and potentially more dangerous.
Joseph P. Kennedy and organized crime narratives
- Some historical commentary alleges Joseph P. Kennedy maintained ties to underworld networks.
- Election-era allegations continue to circulate that organized crime influence helped deliver key votes in 1960, including in places like Chicago and West Virginia.
Robert Kennedy’s crackdown
- As Attorney General, RFK aggressively prosecuted organized crime figures.
- That shift is frequently cited as a possible retaliation motive in Mafia-focused assassination theories.
Intelligence overlap
- Formal investigations and historical reporting have long discussed CIA interaction with organized crime figures in anti-Castro efforts.
- That overlap remains one of the most cited foundations for the idea that cross-network relationships could enable denial and misdirection.
What This Suggests in Hindsight
- The Kennedys may have inherited systems of influence they could not fully control.
- RFK’s crackdown created enemies with motive and reach.
- Intelligence ties to criminal actors created a structure capable of ambiguity, secrecy, and narrative conflict.
Key Question: If multiple systems had motive, leverage, and access, what stops the story from being closed too early?
The Open Case: What’s Still Missing?
Even with newly unsealed files, critics continue to argue there are major gaps that limit the public’s ability to draw final conclusions.
- Some records tied to assassination-related discussions remain classified or incomplete in the public record.
- Files related to internal restrictions on CIA power remain a recurring debate topic.
- Surveillance records related to organized crime have been described as incomplete, missing, or destroyed in some cases.
- Questions remain about internal leadership communications after JFK’s death and how the official narrative stabilized.
Central Question: If the official story is fully settled, why do key document categories remain hard to fully verify?
2026 Research Note: Help Expand This Investigation
I plan to pursue these files more deeply in 2026—especially around how Cuba operations, intelligence networks, and institutional blowback may connect to later events.
This is an engagement-driven investigation. I want to hear what serious readers believe they’ve confirmed—or what appears falsified, incomplete, or engineered.
What I’m Looking For From You
- What detail about Bay of Pigs or Operation Mongoose feels most important?
- What seems credible—and what seems distorted or incomplete?
- Which individuals, memos, timelines, or “missing pieces” deserve closer scrutiny?
- If you have public source links (archives, document scans, official releases), share them.
Standard for discussion: bring your strongest evidence or reasoning, not just a conclusion.
Next in the Series
Continue to Part 3:
JFK and the Mafia: The Real Assassination Connections
Back to the Main JFK Files Hub
JFK Files: The Secrets They Reveal
Earn Rewards for Reading
You can earn discounts and perks for reading and leaving feedback on the content you already use.
Step 1: Join or Sign In
Join Righteous Rewards Program
Step 2: Review and Earn
After you sign in, earn points by leaving quick reviews on ebooks and free guides here: